From: Paul Spiegelman
Sent: Sunday,
December 17, 2006
10:43 PM
To: Ellen Lirley – Coastal Commission
Cc: Joe Burwell; John Beaver
Subject: Additional Information on Torrey Pines Project - Century
Club
Dear Ms. Lirley,
I just
received additional information regarding the Century Club which relates
to the
Tournament
Support
Building; attached are minutes of the City Council Meeting of February
11, 2002. At that meeting, the City Council authorized the payment of
$950,000 to the Century Club to reimburse the Century Club for outlays
on the renovation of Torrey Pines South.
The significance of this payment is that it
further illustrates the untrustworthiness of the information put out by
the Century Club and its unwholesome, exploitative relationship with the
City. On pages 6-8 of our Supplemental Statement, SDMGA notes that the
Century Club and its offshoot, The Friends of Torrey Pines, (private
organizations with membership limited to the affluent) publicly boasted
of their raising money to finance the renovation of the South Course and
then used their position as go-between with the U.S.G.A. to divert $3.5
million in revenues that should be going to the City back to the
individual members of the Friends of Torrey Pines. The City Council
action in 2002 to pay the Century Club $950,000 (which it notes was part
of an arrangement made before the Century Club helped raise the money)
is material information which the Century Club fails to disclose when it
makes claims that it raised over $3 million for the South Course
renovations. Moreover, the undisclosed sum means that the Century
Club/Friends of Torrey Pines has made a substantial profit at the City’s
expense: it has obtained $4.45 million back (the $950,000 payment from
the City plus the $3.5 million from the U.S.G.A.) on a $3 million
investment, a 48.3% profit on what the Century Club has repeatedly
claimed was a gift to the City. And, as pointed out in our Supplemental
Statement, the increased maintenance on the South necessitated by the
renovations (the City claims that the effect of the renovations was to
double the cost of maintaining the South Course) is also paid for by
golfers in higher greens fees. In addition, the difficulty of the South
Course has led golf management to allow 25% fewer rounds on the South
Course. Thus, the Century Club’s “gift” to the City cost golfers
$950,000 in payments from the Enterprise Fund to the Century Club, sharp
increases in greens fees, and a reduction of 22,500 rounds per year in
the number of rounds we can play on the South Course. Meanwhile the
Century Club has profited $1,450,000 on the project!
San Diego
municipal golfers cannot afford any more such Trojan Horse gifts from
the Century Club.
SDMGA is concerned that the construction
of the unnecessary Tournament Support Building as the home base of the
Century Club on Torrey Pines will facilitate the Century Club’s agendas:
the elimination of Torrey Pines as an affordable coastal recreational
facility, the expropriation of public parkland for its own private
purposes, and the financial exploitation of local golfers and the Golf
Enterprise Fund. The Century Club’s approach seems to be “ordinary
citizens must pay so that millionaires can play.” If this private club
for the wealthy gains a permanent base on Torrey Pines, the end of
Torrey Pines as a municipal golf course could soon follow. We urge the
Coastal Commission to reject the Tournament Support Building (as well as
the other unnecessary and extravagant Torrey Projects) or at least
impose conditions on any such construction such that a private
organization whose membership is restricted to the wealthy will not be
allowed to be based on public parkland and not be allowed to exploit the
Golf Enterprise Fund. (For a list of conditions that should be imposed
if the Commission is considering allowing the
Tournament
Support Building to be constructed, see Supplemental Statement, page 9.)
Thank you for considering this additional
information.
Respectfully yours,
San Diego
Municipal Golfers Alliance.
John Beaver, Joe Burwell, Paul Spiegelman,
individually and as co-founders
by:
Paul J. Spiegelman, Attorney for Appellants


